Top US Players

Real Hawk-Eye ball tracking

Both sides of the court, Indian Wells 2025 qualifying

Quan, Gomez and Watanuki: both players’ movement and ball trajectories in both matches. Replay all 331 recorded deliveries and 1,157 shots, or browse every available match export and film.

Open the 3D court

Hawk-Eye data via TDI, shown with permission. Both players. Five point endings are absent from the source.

The top five American men and women

ATP rank · ESPN feed 24 Sep 2026WTA rank · official 28 Sep 2026Charted thru 18 Sep 2026 · 406 matches · 63,747 points

Ranked by the latest published singles rankings. Serve, return and shot numbers come from point-by-point charts of their matches since January 2024, which volunteers code shot by shot for the Match Charting Project. Charted matches are a sample that leans toward big events, not every match played.

Men · ATP

ESPN ATP feed, 24 Sep 2026
RankPlayerServe wonReturn wonDR
4Ben Shelton · lefty66.1%31.3%0.92
8Frances Tiafoe64.3%32.5%0.91
12Taylor Fritz71.2%34.3%1.19
15Learner Tien · lefty62.3%38.8%1.03
16Tommy Paul62.9%38.8%1.05

Women · WTA

WTA official, 28 Sep 2026
RankPlayerServe wonReturn wonDR
3Jessica Pegula60.4%44.3%1.12
4Coco Gauff60.4%48.0%1.21
11Amanda Anisimova58.7%44.7%1.08
13Iva Jovic58.6%46.0%1.11
23Madison Keys58.8%43.4%1.05

Bars run from 50% to 76% (serve) and 25% to 52% (return); the black tick is the tour group's pooled figure.

Where each player wins points

60%65%70%28%30%32%34%36%38%40%42%44%46%48%50%DR 1.2DR 1.3Men pooled: 66.4% serve, 35.0% returnWomen pooled: 59.4% serve, 45.6% returnSheltonBen Shelton: 66.1% serve points won, 31.3% return points wonTiafoeFrances Tiafoe: 64.3% serve points won, 32.5% return points wonFritzTaylor Fritz: 71.2% serve points won, 34.3% return points wonTienLearner Tien: 62.3% serve points won, 38.8% return points wonPaulTommy Paul: 62.9% serve points won, 38.8% return points wonPegulaJessica Pegula: 60.4% serve points won, 44.3% return points wonGauffCoco Gauff: 60.4% serve points won, 48% return points wonAnisimovaAmanda Anisimova: 58.7% serve points won, 44.7% return points wonJovicIva Jovic: 58.6% serve points won, 46% return points wonKeysMadison Keys: 58.8% serve points won, 43.4% return points wonServe points won →Return points won →

Up and to the right wins. The dashed lines join equal dominance ratios (return points won over serve points lost), so a big server and a strong returner can sit on the same line.

The men cluster on the serve side: the five hold 66.4% of serve points pooled and win 35.0% on return. The women flip it, 59.4% and 45.6%.

A cross marks each tour group's pooled figure. Click a dot for that player's serve map, shot directions and results.

Paths to the top

Men

ATP year-end via Wikipedia timelines
No. 1251020501002005001000’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25NowShelton 4Tiafoe 8Fritz 12Tien 15Paul 16

Women

WTA official API, last ranking of each year
No. 1251020501002005001000’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25NowPegula 3Gauff 4Anisimova 11Jovic 13Keys 23
Glossary
Rank, Points
· singles ranking and points from the most recent published list; the ATP list is read from ESPN's public rankings feed because atptour.com blocks scripted reads
YE
· year-end ranking. Men: the 'Year-end ranking' row of each Wikipedia performance timeline. Women: the last ranking the WTA published in that calendar year
Serve won
· points won on own serve, of all service points, across charted matches since 1 Jan 2024; pooled, so long matches weigh more
Return won
· points won when receiving, of all return points, same sample
DR
· dominance ratio: return points won divided by serve points lost. Above 1.00 means winning more than conceding
Charted
· matches of this player in the Match Charting Project since 1 Jan 2024. Volunteers pick which matches to chart
Pooled
· the tour group's totals added up before dividing, not an average of the five percentages